Virtualization Benchmark Showdown – Parallels 10 vs. Fusion 7 vs. VirtualBox
Reddit I wrote about the release of Parallels Desktop 14 a few weeks ago. I had certainly heard of Parallels Desktop before, but I jumped on the Fusion train and kept on upgrading over the years. When I read about Parallels Desktop 14, I decided that it was time to try something new. On macOS, you can use one of these apps to open a copy of Windows, Linux, or even additional versions of macOS for testing. I have some legacy applications that require me to access them in Internet Explorer Classic, but others might be required to use the PC versions of Office or another Windows-specific app.
Virtualization Wars: VMware vs. Hyper V: This article was originally published in May of It was updated in June of , and again December of While new IT trends in backup, storage, and more are emerging at the speed of sound, virtualization continues to become the data center norm. According to Gartner , more than half of all server workloads are currently virtualized.
That number is expected to rise to 86 percent in Most of us look at the virtualization wars as a matter of two foes: VMware and Hyper-V. Stick with me as I nerd things up a bit. VMware reminds me of pro wrestling entertainment company WWE. These are easily the two biggest shows in town. But like the wrestling industry, the virtualization space is a great big world with more to offer than many of its fans even realize. To no surprise, VMware and Microsoft came in as number one and number two on the leaderboard.
Number One with a Bullet According to Gartner, VMware is still a dominant force with a broad and sustainable market strategy. But they excelled at it. Vsphere, the franchise fighter, aims to simplify x86 server virtualization by leveraging a mix of brawn and sophistication. Sysadmins can count on this hypervisor heavyweight to take on demanding workloads, effortlessly hoist them into the cloud, and intelligently adapt to the most challenging IT environments.
VMware may be a little flashy, but Gartner reports that products like vSphere still scores high marks in the area of customer satisfaction. However, the areas in which the top dogs are lacking can be viewed as stepping stones competitors can use to make up ground.
Based on the Gartner report, expensive offerings and the inability to embrace the right trends at the right time may eventually allow VMware challengers to lessen the gap. Hyper-V shares a lot of similarities with the number two wrestling promotion I referenced earlier.
Like TNA delivers a wrestling product that is every good as WWE in the ring, Hyper-V is a quality virtualization offering that helps IT departments tap into the true power of bit computing. Despite its ability to create awareness and grab the number two spot, Hyper-V is still having trouble catching on with the diehards who give all praise to VMware.
And as TNA struggles to reach the top of the mountain, it has allowed other smaller promotions to catch up. Microsoft is facing the same struggle as open source challengers continue to creep up on its tail. But constructed as is, their strategy will only take them so far.
Some say ROH delivers the best wrestling on the planet. The in-ring product is as crisp and fluid as can be. That second part definitely sounds like a familiar database giant. The Magic Quadrant report identified Oracle as a competitor with a strong line of products that can deliver the optimal performance enterprise demands from virtualization.
Red Hat is another niche player to keep an eye on. A relative newcomer, Lucha Underground offers an exciting brand of pro wrestling inspired by the luchadore tradition that is still a big deal in Mexico to this day. While Red Hat maintains the biggest commercial Linux distribution, it holds on tightly to the open source roots that helped catapult the firm to enterprise fame. Gartner pointed out that Red Hat needs to be more aggressive in marketing its virtualization offering in order to generate the sales that are essential to its very survival.
It also pointed to niche appeal as a potential strong suite. IT smarks are discovering that better virtualization solutions may exist in trends like containers and integration with cloud computing, the gift that just keeps on giving. Containers and virtual machines aim to accomplish the same goal — containers just do it more efficiently.
Like a VM, a container has an OS, file system, and network that can be accessed as if run on a physical or virtual machine. Unlike a VM, a container allows applications, resources, and processes to run cleanly in isolated packages without impacting the rest of the system. A slim, simplified approach to isolation is the reason this phenomenon and its associated ecosystem is being hailed as the next generation of virtualization.
The container concept has the power to not only revolutionize the development field, but IT as a whole. Developers can use it to create portable applications that run in any environment — server or laptop, private or public cloud — saving more time and using fewer resources.
For IT departments, containers offer a stable environment for each stage of development, testing, and production. The overall consensus is that hybrid clouds are the next logical step up from the virtual infrastructure. Hybrid environments allow IT to further bolster virtualization by optimizing key areas like disaster recovery.
When disaster strikes, organizations need the ability to replicate data to various storage targets like private clouds in the data center to public clouds offsite and back again. A hybrid cloud enables sysadmins to execute this extensive process in fast and effective fashion — all from a centralized interface that makes everything easy to manage. On one hand, fans seemingly know too much and are in turn, harder to please.
On the other, pleasing them may very well be as simple as listening to their chatter across the dirt sheets, social networks, and message boards. Less talking. More wrestling. More pushing wrestlers who gain organic fan support. Comparatively speaking, it could be a similar case for the topic at hand. The victor in the virtualization wars may turn out to be the player that conveniently serves up the trends enterprise IT teams have in their sights.
VMware is sitting comfortable. Microsoft has made strides. But with containers on the rise and hybrid clouds making more sense than ever, even the niche players may have something to say about who makes their mark in this intensely competitive arena.
So which are you siding with? Is VMware still the standard for enterprise virtualization, has Hyper-V finally won you over, or is there another option you favor?
Virtualization Use Cases
A Look at Mac Hypervisors: But, a problem arises: What about those Windows apps? What kind of games can I play and how well do they run? When answered honestly, I say not well. There are games that you can play, and like most computers, the greater the hardware, the better the experience. With that being said, you are still running games within a virtual machine that sits ON TOP of the OS X operating system that is running directly off of your hardware.
VIDEO: Can You Run a VM from an External Drive? – Parallels Blog
I have parallels on my home machine, VMware Fusion on my work . even begin to unlock the same performance as parallels or VMware. Fusion 11 may not be as slick as Parallels Desktop, but enterprise users VAT, or $), Fusion can still be bought for a one-time price of. The hypervisor is arguably the most important piece in the virtualization puzzle. Which of these heavy-hitters is right for you, VMware or Hyper V?.